|  Home
 
 Background
  Biographical details
  Collaborative experience
  Publications
  Patents
 
 
 | Purpose
"Molecular
                design of biologically active small is intrinsically
                complicated and hard, and it is getting harder and more
                complicated every day. For one thing, it is inherently multi-objective ,
                with improvement in one attribute - e.g., potency -
                often coming at the expense of another - e.g.,
                bioavailability. Moreover, attributes such as half-life
                exhibit optima as well as trends, requiring a careful
                balancing act between being cleared too quickly and
                being cleared too slowly.
                 
                Given that complexity, it makes sense to bring as many
                disciplines to bear on the problem as possible; cranking
                blindly through black box models or a synthetic strategy
                of methyl, ethyl, butyl, futyl ... will not get the job
                done. That is why drug discovery and development has
                evolved into a team activity, with people from many
                disciplines working together.  
                 
                Biochemical Infometrics was founded in 2008 as a way to
                make my drug design experience available to smaller
                companies and it closed down in January 2010 when I
                became Director of Life Sciences at Simulations
                  Plus, Inc . My time there afforded me many great
                opportunities to apply my inter- and trans-disciplinary
                perspective to challenging modeling problems in DMPK and
                predictive toxicology. Retiring from Simulations Plus on
                April Fool's Day in 2022 has given me more freedom to
                write, to collaborate, and to explore new approaches to
                old problems. My Adjunct Professorship in Informatics at
                Indiana
                  University Bloomington  provides some excellent
                opportunities for doing that, but I am also resurrecting
                Biochemical Informatics as a scientific consulting group
                - albeit a nonprofit one, at least for the time being."
              
 
                
                 
                  Oral Presentation20 August 2022
 Fall National ACS Meeting in Chicago
Coupling high-throughput pharmacokinetic
                    simulation (HTPK) to multi-objective molecular
                    evolution of triazolopyrimidine antimalarial leadsDe novo drug design is a
                    long-standing challenge in computational chemistry.
                    Much recent work has centered on using generative
                    neural networks and related technologies to create
                    chemical libraries that reproduce property &or
                    structural distributions that mimic those of
                    compounds known to be active against a selected
                    target. The AI-driven Drug Design (AIDD) module in
                    ADMET Predictorฎ takes a different approach: in
                    AIDD, one or more molecules are submitted to
                    randomly chosen SMIRKS transformations, yielding
                    products that are then evaluated against a panel of
                    structural SMARTS filters and objective functions.
                    Those that pass the filters and are Pareto optimal
                    with respect to the objectives and to the prior
                    generation of analogs are carried forward as the
                    next generation, which is itself subject to
                    additional transformations, and so on.
 The case study to be presented here involves a
                    series of triazolopyrimidines (TzPs) that inhibit
                    the dihydroorotate dehydrogenase of the malarial
                    parasite, Plasmodium falciparum (PfDHODH)
                    [1]. Examples from very early in the synthesis
                    program were input to AIDD as structural seeds from
                    which to evolve several series of analogs optimized
                    against four objective functions: a general
                    artificial neural net ensemble (ANNE) model of PfDHODH
                    inhibition with a single hidden layer of neurons
                    [2]; bioavailability estimates obtained by
                    high-throughput pharmacokinetic (HTPK) simulation;
                    synthetic difficulty estimates; and a set of
                    absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and
                    toxicity (ADMET) property estimates encoded as a
                    weighted set of rules (AIDD Risk).
 
 The output analogs obtained afforded good structural
                    coverage of the activity space, were novel but
                    synthetically reasonable. They included several that
                    were actually synthesized later in the TzP program.
                    Those subsequently synthesized analogs included
                    several that were not in the data set used to build
                    the ANNE activity model. Hence this
                      case study is largely prospective in nature
                    despite being drawn from the literature.
 
 
 1. M.A. Phillips et al., J.
                      Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 36493653.2. Clark et al., J. Comput.-Aided Drug Des.
                    2020, 34, 1117-1132.
 
 Hedge Your Bets to Come
                  Out AheadIf you watch the
                  people who make a living at racetracks, you will see
                  that they do not pick winners.  Instead, they
                  typically bet on several horses to Win, Place or
                  Show.  In many ways, drug development is a
                  similar game, in that you are operating with limited
                  and imperfect information and chance plays a big part
                  in how your corporate gambles turn out.  
 Intelligent molecular design can add value - a lot of value - by
                  helping you spread your risk rationally across leads
                  and candidates.  Most people already appreciate
                  the importance of cultivating structural diversity and
                  synthetic accessibility when picking compounds for
                  follow-up acquisition or synthesis, but there is as
                  much or more to be gained by diversifying across
                  likely ADMET and PK risks as well.  Being able to
                  make relevant and reliable predictions of the
                  corresponding  properties within the realm of
                  well-explored chemistry is critical.  Such
                  predictions are still something of an art when one
                  ventures into new areas, but that is where the value
                  added is.
 
  
 
                   
 ฉ 2022 Biochemical Infometrics; all rights reserved.
 
 | Skill Base
 
   predictive uncertainty
  
                predictive ADME/Tox
  
              QSAR & statistics
  
                  library design
   biometrics
  
                  synthesis
  
                biochemistry
   cheminformatics
   intellectual property
 
 
 
 |